Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Chloral hydrate¿Í MidazolamÀÇ °æ±¸Åõ¿©½Ã ÁøÁ¤È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ORAL CHLORAL HYDRATE VS. ORAL MIDAZOLAM IN SEDATIVE EFFECT

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 32±Ç 1È£ p.40 ~ 48
¿À¸í½Å, ÀÌâ¼·, ÀÌ»óÈ£, À̳­¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿À¸í½Å ( Oh Myung-Sin ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌâ¼· ( Lee Chang-Seep ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óÈ£ ( Lee Sang-Ho ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À̳­¿µ ( Lee Nan-Young ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Àü½Å»óÅ°¡ ¾çÈ£Çϸç 2ȸ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Ä¡·á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ³²¾Æ 10¸í, ¿©¾Æ 12¸í ÃÑ 22¸íÀÇ È¯¾Æ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î chloral hydrate(Pocral^(?) syrup, ÇѸ²Á¦¾à) 60mg/kg¿Í hydroxyzine(Ucerax^(?)Á¤, Çѱ¹ À¯¾¾ºñÁ¦¾à) 25mgÀ» º´¿ëÅõ¿©ÇÑ ±º°ú midazolam(Dormicum^(?), ÁÖ, Çѱ¹·Î½´) 0.5mg/kg°ú hydroxyzine(Ucerax^(?) syrup, Çѱ¹ À¯¾¾ºñÁ¦¾à) 25mgÀ» º´¿ëÅõ¿©ÇÑ ±ºÀ» °¢°¢ ¥°±º°ú ¥±±ºÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾à¹° Åõ¿© 30ºÐ ÈÄ Ä¡°úÄ¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Ä¡·á°úÁ¤À» 6´Ü°è·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© °¢ ´Ü°èº°·Î ¼ö¸éÁö¼ö¿Í ¿ïÀ½Áö¼ö, ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÁö¼ö, Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ÇൿÁö¼ö¸¦ ÃøÁ¤, ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.

1. Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ÇൿÁö¼ö¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ¼º°ø·üÀ» Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú ¥°±ºÀº 59.2%, ¥±±ºÀº 77.3%ÀÇ ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p£¼0.05).

2. ¼ö¸éÁö¼ö´Â ¥°±º¿¡¼­ Æò±Õ 1.81¡¾0.93À¸·Î ¥±±ºÀÇ 1.44¡¾0.69¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ±íÀº ¼ö¸é»óŸ¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p£¼0.05).

3. ¿ïÀ½Áö¼ö, ¿òÁ÷ÀÓÁö¼ö, Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ÇൿÁö¼ö´Â ±º °£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p£¾0.05).

4. ¼ºº°¿¡ µû¸¥, ¿¬·É¿¡ µû¸¥ ±º °£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p£¾0.05).

À§¿Í °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ midazolamÀÇ °æ±¸Åõ¿©´Â ÀûÀýÇÑ ÁøÁ¤È¿°ú¸¦ °¡Áö´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ¾î¸°È¯ÀÚÀÇ Ä¡°úÄ¡·á½Ã À¯¿ëÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

The purpose of present study was to compare the sedative effect of chloral hydrate and oral midazolam treatment. The study was conducted on twenty two child patients who required at least two visits. All the patients showed a good physical status (ASA-I). The patient was randomly assigned to receive drug either chloral hydrate 60mg/kg and hydroxyzine 25mg(Group ¥°) or midazolam 0.5mg£¯kg and hydroxyzine 25mg(Group ¥±) at each visit. Treatment procedures were divided into six stages. In each stage, sleep, crying, movement and overall behavior score were evaluated.

The overall results can be summarized as follows:

1. Success rate was 59.9% in group ¥° and was 77.8% in Group ¥±.

2. Mean sleep score was 1.81¡¾0.93 in group ¥° and was 1.44¡¾0.69 in group ¥± (P£¼0.05).

3. Through all treatment procedures, no significant difference was observed between group ¥° and group ¥± in terms of crying, movement and overall behavior score(P£¾0.05).

4. There was no significant difference between the sex and the age(P£¾0.05).

In regard to above results, oral midazolam considered to be a valuable drug as sedative agent in pediatric dentistry.

Å°¿öµå

ÁøÁ¤;Chloral hydrate;Midazolam;°æ±¸Åõ¿©
Sedation;Chloral hydrate;Midazolam;Oral administration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI